Author Topic: Prehistoric Plants  (Read 2279 times)

stemturtle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Odontochelys
  • v.1 status and posts: Full Member (159 posts)
Prehistoric Plants
« on: July 26, 2012, 07:56:21 PM »
We continue the tread from DTF v1: Prehistoric Plants, wondering what 2013 will bring.


COLLECTA Cycadeoids 2012
Williamsonia (13 cm.).  Jurassic - Cretaceous. Height 2 to 3 meters.
Monanthesia (9 cm.) and Cycadeoidea (4 cm.). Cretaceous.  Height to 2 meters.


COLLECTA Hypsilophodon  and Koreaceratops Families 2012.  Trees are not identified.

The Hypsilophodon tree (4 cm.) looks like a tree fern.  The base can be connected to Williamsonia
The Koreaceratops tree (3 cm.) resembles a cycadeoid or possibly a cycad.  The base can be connected to Monanthesia and Cycadeoidea.

Cycadeoid is an informal name for the order Bennettitales, also called Cycadeoidales. Triassic – Cretaceous.  Cycadeoids may be mistaken for cycads, which are order Cycadales. 

Cretaceous cycadeoid fossils were over-collected from a site south of the Black Hills, South Dakota, misnamed Cycad National Monument, 1922 – 1957.  Deauthorization of monument status at the request of the National Park Service resulted from the lack of visible fossils and failure to fund construction of a visitor center.   Kirk Johnson reported this tale in the book, “Cruisin' the Fossil Freeway,” available on Amazon.

« Last Edit: August 24, 2012, 02:10:21 PM by stemturtle »

Mural at New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (Click image)

Vinyl Scratch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Muttaburrasaurus
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2012, 09:21:21 AM »
Nice pictures! I am thinking of getting those Koreaceratops now! ;D

Check out my Dioramas and my two collections!

Bokisaurus

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 467
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Amargasaurus
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2012, 07:00:29 PM »
Very nice. I hope that you will be able to add some of the pictures from your old thread, it would be cool to see them all together again here in one thread. There were some from your collection ( I believe converted) that are super cool!

stemturtle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Odontochelys
  • v.1 status and posts: Full Member (159 posts)
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2012, 12:23:00 AM »
Bokisaurus asked for photos from the original thread.  Good suggestion.   The CollectA Tree & Plant Collection and Safari Prehistoric Landscapes are featured, in hope that there will be future additions.  A few new comments follow.


COLLECTA, Tree & Plant Collection, 2009
Ginkgo biloba (10”) is a living fossil. The genus began in the Jurassic. Height 115 to 164 feet.
Cycad (12”). Jurassic. Based on Pseudoctenis lanei. Height to 50 feet.


WILD SAFARI, Prehistoric Landscapes, 2011
Tree Fern, Cycad, Agathis Conifer.

Tree Fern (5”) specified as Jurassic, height to 65 feet.
Mauro-Raptaor86 posted that it is based on Psaronius, Carboniferous to Permian.

Cycad (4”) Triassic – Cretaceous, height to 50 feet.
Mauro-Raptaor86 wrote that it was inspired by Pentoxylon. Cycads are Permian to Recent.

Agathis Conifer (6.75”) common in Jurassic and Cretaceous, height to 150 feet.
Araucarioxylon includes fossil logs in the Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona.

Mural at New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (Click image)

Mauro "Raptor86"

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • Sicilian collector in Amsterdam
    • View Profile
    • Paleo-Nerd
  • Dinosaur: Deinonychus
  • v.1 status and posts: Full Member from Jan 2008
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2012, 09:46:44 AM »
The new Playmobil Dinos series has some nice "prehistoric" plants, too!


stemturtle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Odontochelys
  • v.1 status and posts: Full Member (159 posts)
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2012, 02:24:24 PM »
The new Playmobil Dinos series has some nice "prehistoric" plants, too!

Forum members are encouraged to post photos.  Playmobil 5235 Dimetrodon with water hole is not available yet in the USA, but is sold now in the UK at amazon.co.uk.

Mural at New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (Click image)

SBell

  • Ultimate Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1176
  • Rowsdower--Zap Rowsdower
    • View Profile
    • T.rex Discovery Centre website
  • Dinosaur: No dinosaur--Pachycrocuta!
  • v.1 status and posts: Ultimate Member/Exiled Moderator ;) (6028 posts)
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2012, 05:18:55 PM »
The new Playmobil Dinos series has some nice "prehistoric" plants, too!

Forum members are encouraged to post photos.  Playmobil 5235 Dimetrodon with water hole is not available yet in the USA, but is sold now in the UK at amazon.co.uk.

It's terrible, we always have to wait one year behind Europe for Playmobil releases--which means you can check out the .de site an dknow what's coming a year from now (hence, forewarning about the cool Stone Age line for this year...).

But mostly, I want the plants and small reptiles. The kids can have the dinos.

stemturtle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Odontochelys
  • v.1 status and posts: Full Member (159 posts)
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2012, 07:46:00 PM »
It's terrible, we always have to wait one year behind Europe for Playmobil releases--which means you can check out the .de site an dknow what's coming a year from now (hence, forewarning about the cool Stone Age line for this year...).

But mostly, I want the plants and small reptiles. The kids can have the dinos.

Thanks for the tip, SBell.  Playmobil Deutschland Online Shop shows several pictures of sets that include plants.  Stone Age is Steinzeit.  Children and grandchildren are happy to get dinosaurs without the accessories.

Mural at New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (Click image)

SBell

  • Ultimate Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1176
  • Rowsdower--Zap Rowsdower
    • View Profile
    • T.rex Discovery Centre website
  • Dinosaur: No dinosaur--Pachycrocuta!
  • v.1 status and posts: Ultimate Member/Exiled Moderator ;) (6028 posts)
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2012, 08:30:01 PM »
It's terrible, we always have to wait one year behind Europe for Playmobil releases--which means you can check out the .de site an dknow what's coming a year from now (hence, forewarning about the cool Stone Age line for this year...).

But mostly, I want the plants and small reptiles. The kids can have the dinos.

Thanks for the tip, SBell.  Playmobil Deutschland Online Shop shows several pictures of sets that include plants.  Stone Age is Steinzeit.  Children and grandchildren are happy to get dinosaurs without the accessories.

Well, we've derailed enough, however the Stoneage was released last year in Europe, and is out now in North America.  Given their record, the dinos should be in NorAm next spring.

amargasaurus cazaui

  • Ultimate Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 919
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Psittacosaurus
  • v.1 status and posts: Non evolved
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2012, 09:47:35 AM »
I wanted to clarify something if you do not mind Stemturtle. I was looking at the new plants for this year and considering. I had purchased the family of Koreaceratops as somewhat of a accompanying piece to my Psittacosaurus skeleton as the animals are quite similar in general. I was pondering getting one of the large plants that came out this year...and reviewing your post, I am led to understand either would align well with the koreaceratops family, but only one with the hysphilodons? So a person could get both to use with the Koreaceratops family but NOT the other set correct?
  I know the thread states this, but I am wishing to confirm it before throwing money out there and getting something that would not lock into my purpose.
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


stemturtle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Odontochelys
  • v.1 status and posts: Full Member (159 posts)
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2012, 11:58:04 AM »
I wanted to clarify something if you do not mind Stemturtle. I was looking at the new plants for this year and considering. I had purchased the family of Koreaceratops as somewhat of a accompanying piece to my Psittacosaurus skeleton as the animals are quite similar in general. I was pondering getting one of the large plants that came out this year...and reviewing your post, I am led to understand either would align well with the koreaceratops family, but only one with the hysphilodons? So a person could get both to use with the Koreaceratops family but NOT the other set correct?
  I know the thread states this, but I am wishing to confirm it before throwing money out there and getting something that would not lock into my purpose.

The bases of these figures butt against each other, but they do not actually lock together.  It would work fine to sandwich the Koreaceratops family between the two kinds of cycadeoid trees, but I would recommend buying these trees based on their own merit.

Mural at New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (Click image)

stemturtle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Odontochelys
  • v.1 status and posts: Full Member (159 posts)
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #11 on: August 16, 2012, 05:33:15 PM »

Plants from the Playmobil Dimetrodon with Water Hole.  Animals are not shown.

I suspect that the Playmobil plants tend toward general representatives rather than specific genera.

The tree (6.5") could be a cycad because of the barrel-shaped trunk.
The lily pad began in the Cretaceous, an early angiosperm.
The log is on a hinge to be positioned either upright or fallen.  The orange leaves appear to be dead.
The dark green plant looks like a ground cover.
The sedge is called a bulrush or cattail on eBay.
The plant on the right reminds me of a carnivorous sundew.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2012, 06:17:33 PM by stemturtle »

Mural at New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (Click image)

Blackdanter

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
    • View Profile
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #12 on: August 16, 2012, 09:14:21 PM »
Here's an observation from a plantsmans point of view. On both the unamed Collecta Tree fern (with the Hypsilophodon family) and the named Wild Safari version the new frond growth is actually unfurling back to front. The fronds unfurl from the centre of the crown creating new trunk as they do so. In effect, the coil of the frond faces inwards not outwards from the centre of the trunk. Trunk formation would be impossible as the plants have been modelled. That's quite a major error in terms of tree fern biology, akin to putting the head on backwards on a Tyrannosaurus! Worse still when you make the error and then have the brass balls to name the species!  ::)

CityRaptor

  • Ultimate Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 649
  • One Million Years BC !
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Troodon
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #13 on: August 16, 2012, 09:36:34 PM »
Oh, that could be an issue of not doing proper research. Most people probably would not care about this however, given that the plants are rarely the focus of a Diorama and most people care more about the animals anyways.
Jurassic Park is frightning in the dark
All the dinosaurs are running wild
Someone let T. Rex out of his pen
I'm afraid those things'll harm me
'Cause they sure don't act like Barney
And they think that I'm their dinner, not their friend
Oh no

stemturtle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
  • Dinosaur: Odontochelys
  • v.1 status and posts: Full Member (159 posts)
Re: Prehistoric Plants
« Reply #14 on: August 16, 2012, 11:17:27 PM »
Here's an observation from a plantsmans point of view. On both the unamed Collecta Tree fern (with the Hypsilophodon family) and the named Wild Safari version the new frond growth is actually unfurling back to front. The fronds unfurl from the centre of the crown creating new trunk as they do so. In effect, the coil of the frond faces inwards not outwards from the centre of the trunk. Trunk formation would be impossible as the plants have been modelled. That's quite a major error in terms of tree fern biology, akin to putting the head on backwards on a Tyrannosaurus! Worse still when you make the error and then have the brass balls to name the species!  ::)


Tree ferns

Blackdanter, the Forum is fortunate to have a plantsman as a member.  The photos are tree ferns on the Alakai Swamp Trail, Kauai, Hawaii.  The fiddleheads curl inward toward each other rather than curl away as sculpted in the models.  Thank you for this observation.  I confess that I love these models anyway, since my B.A. is in Zoology.

Mural at New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (Click image)