The Dinosaur Toy Forum Diorama Contest 2013 sponsored by Safari Ltd is now open!
The new Playmobil Dinos series has some nice "prehistoric" plants, too!
Quote from: Mauro "Raptor86" on July 30, 2012, 09:46:44 AMThe new Playmobil Dinos series has some nice "prehistoric" plants, too!Forum members are encouraged to post photos. Playmobil 5235 Dimetrodon with water hole is not available yet in the USA, but is sold now in the UK at amazon.co.uk.
It's terrible, we always have to wait one year behind Europe for Playmobil releases--which means you can check out the .de site an dknow what's coming a year from now (hence, forewarning about the cool Stone Age line for this year...).But mostly, I want the plants and small reptiles. The kids can have the dinos.
Quote from: SBell on July 30, 2012, 05:18:55 PMIt's terrible, we always have to wait one year behind Europe for Playmobil releases--which means you can check out the .de site an dknow what's coming a year from now (hence, forewarning about the cool Stone Age line for this year...).But mostly, I want the plants and small reptiles. The kids can have the dinos.Thanks for the tip, SBell. Playmobil Deutschland Online Shop shows several pictures of sets that include plants. Stone Age is Steinzeit. Children and grandchildren are happy to get dinosaurs without the accessories.
I wanted to clarify something if you do not mind Stemturtle. I was looking at the new plants for this year and considering. I had purchased the family of Koreaceratops as somewhat of a accompanying piece to my Psittacosaurus skeleton as the animals are quite similar in general. I was pondering getting one of the large plants that came out this year...and reviewing your post, I am led to understand either would align well with the koreaceratops family, but only one with the hysphilodons? So a person could get both to use with the Koreaceratops family but NOT the other set correct? I know the thread states this, but I am wishing to confirm it before throwing money out there and getting something that would not lock into my purpose.
Here's an observation from a plantsmans point of view. On both the unamed Collecta Tree fern (with the Hypsilophodon family) and the named Wild Safari version the new frond growth is actually unfurling back to front. The fronds unfurl from the centre of the crown creating new trunk as they do so. In effect, the coil of the frond faces inwards not outwards from the centre of the trunk. Trunk formation would be impossible as the plants have been modelled. That's quite a major error in terms of tree fern biology, akin to putting the head on backwards on a Tyrannosaurus! Worse still when you make the error and then have the brass balls to name the species!